Hydroxyurea in Sickle Cell Disease: Coagulation and Activation in an Observational Study
Rattachement africain : pk. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is characterized by a chronic hypercoagulable state. Hydroxyurea (HU) is known to reduce the frequency of vaso-occlusive events and transfusion requirements in affected individuals. Objective: To assess the impact of hydroxyurea on biomarkers of coagulation (D-dimer) and endothelial activation (soluble VCAM-1) in SCD patients in Pakistan in their steady state. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in patients aged ⩾ 10 years with confirmed HbSS or HbSβ-thalassemia genotypes. Biomarkers were measured at baseline and after 6 months of HU therapy. Results: Twenty-five patients (HbSS = 15 [60%], HbSβ-thalassemia = 10 [40%]) with a median (IQR) age of 23 (16.5-27) years were enrolled. A significant decrease in D-dimer levels was observed after HU treatment: from a median of 1243 to 830 ng/mL ( P = .028), reflecting a 33% reduction. Soluble VCAM-1 levels showed no statistically significant change (532.6 vs 492.9 ng/mL, P = .381). HbF increased from 20.1% (12.6-27.5) to 28% (20-39) ( P < .001), with a strong positive correlation with HU treatment ( r = .845). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that HU therapy in Pakistani SCD patients significantly reduces D-dimer levels, suggesting reduced thrombotic activity. While the endothelial marker VCAM-1 showed no significant change, the rise in HbF is consistent with known HU effects.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Hydroxyurea in Sickle Cell Disease: Coagulation and Activation in an Observational Study
- Date Crossref
- 05/03/2026
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.