Understanding, Affirmation, and Belonging: Autistic Pupils Conceptualisations of Inclusion in Mainstream Secondary Schools
Le résumé fourni par la source
This participatory qualitative study explores how autistic adolescents conceptualise inclusion within mainstream secondary schools in England. Against the backdrop of ongoing reforms to Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) provision, nine autistic pupils co-designed a qualitative study which involved interviewing twenty autistic pupils aged 11-17yrs. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis within a critical realist framework. Three interrelated themes emerged: (1) “They think it [autism] is some weird thing”—the importance of whole school understanding; (2) “I see being autistic as part of who I am”—affirmation of difference and (3) “School is made for neurotypical pupils”— the need to belong. Collectively, these findings reveal autistic pupils define inclusion as belonging, understanding, and affirmation of difference, rather than assimilation. The study highlights the persistence of deficit-based constructions of autism in schools and calls for a shift towards neurodiversity-informed, co-designed approaches that embed autistic voices at the heart of policy, pedagogy, and practice. By reframing inclusion through the neurodiversity paradigm, the research argues for schools to move from remediation to recognition, creating educational environments where difference is both expected and valued.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Understanding, Affirmation, and Belonging: Autistic Pupils Conceptualisations of Inclusion in Mainstream Secondary Schools
- Date Crossref
- 20/02/2026
- Éditeur
- Center for Open Science
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.