Contribution of dominant and recessive model effects to the genetic architecture of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Rattachement africain : gb, us, es, au. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Rationale: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a rare, chronic, progressive lung disease with high mortality and few treatment options. Using an additive genetic model, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified multiple risk loci highlighting new genes and pathways of interest. Since IPF risk could also be influenced by non-additive effects, we hypothesised that association analyses using alternative genetic models may provide additional mechanistic insight. Objectives: To perform GWAS of IPF susceptibility to detect associations where the underlying effects are consistent with recessive or dominant genetic models. Methods: We performed GWAS of IPF susceptibility, with logistic regression assuming dominant or recessive genetic models, including 5,159 IPF cases, from clinically-curated sources, and 27,459 controls. We functionally annotated independent signals and performed variant-to-gene mapping, applying fine-mapping to define potentially causal variants and genes. We assessed differential expression levels of genes of interest in publicly available single cell RNAseq data and in primary cells derived from IPF donors and controls. Main Results: expression in airway basal cells of IPF patients compared to controls. Conclusions: Using alternative genetic models in IPF susceptibility GWAS identified new signals and genes, providing new insights into IPF pathogenesis and potential future therapies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Contribution of dominant and recessive model effects to the genetic architecture of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
- Date Crossref
- 19/02/2026
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.