Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Pregnancy outcomes among medically complex populations with high risk of pregnancy mortality in Virginia: a retrospective observational study

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
5Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us, Afrique du Sud. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Abortion may be medically indicated to avert death or permanent harm of the pregnant person. However, some US states now prevent access to abortion for these patients. To evaluate the population for whom this may cause harm, we aimed to estimate the prevalence of severe chronic conditions and pregnancy complications for which induced abortion is indicated, the odds of pregnancy for patients with severe chronic conditions, and compare pregnancy outcomes including induced abortion for pregnancies where such indications are present with pregnancies where they are not. METHODS: In a retrospective observational study using the Virginia All-Payer Claims Database (2018-2019), we identified 1,502,965 female patients aged 14-55 with ≥ 6 months insurance coverage. Medical codes identified severe chronic conditions and pregnancy complications. Pregnancy outcomes were classified using an established algorithm. RESULTS: Among reproductive-aged people, 2.9% had severe chronic conditions that could threaten life with pregnancy. Among 101,582 people who experienced pregnancy, 5.6% had life-threatening complications before their third trimester. Severe chronic conditions were associated with reduced risk of pregnancy (OR: 0.44 [95% CI: 0.41-0.46]), but sickle cell disease patients had increased odds of pregnancy (OR: 2.42 [95% CI: 2.10-2.78]). Compared to pregnancies with neither early complications or severe conditions present, pregnancies involving severe chronic conditions had fewer live births (68.2% vs. 75.3%), more spontaneous abortions (16.9% vs. 12.2%), and more induced abortions (3.7% vs. 2.2%), while pregnancies with early complications also had fewer live births (61.7%) and more spontaneous abortions (25.2%; p < 0.01 for all comparisons). Abortion ratios (induced abortions per 1000 live births) in these data were 5-6 times lower than in Center for Disease Control abortion surveillance data for Virginia 2018-2019, indicating under-ascertainment of induced abortion. CONCLUSIONS: In a state with some abortion restrictions and some protections, thousands of patients experience severe chronic conditions or pregnancy complications for which induced abortion is indicated.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Pregnancy outcomes among medically complex populations with high risk of pregnancy mortality in Virginia: a retrospective observational study
Date Crossref
18/02/2026
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Duke University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Duke Institute for Health Innovation pays non établi dans la notice
    Institution
  • University of North Carolina Health Care pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Department of Health Afrique du Sud (code pays fourni par la source)
    Organisme public
  • UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health Department of Maternal Child Health pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology — Duke University, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research — University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill et Duke Institute for Health Innovation, avec 3 autres affiliations. Pays d’affiliation : Afrique du Sud.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Reproductive Health and ContraceptionMaternal and fetal healthcareCardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.