ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and chemometric analysis as highly sensitive detection tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection in saliva from different types of COVID-19 severity
Rattachement africain : br, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Rapid, non-invasive, and scalable diagnostic tools are essential for managing respiratory viral infections and enhancing pandemic preparedness. While vibrational spectroscopy coupled with chemometrics has emerged as a powerful biosensing tool, many SARS-CoV-2 studies remain constrained by limited sample sizes and narrow clinical characterization. This study evaluates the performance of attenuated total reflection Fourier-transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in saliva samples from a heterogeneous cohort of 207 symptomatic individuals with varying clinical severities. Using RT-qPCR as the gold standard, saliva spectra were processed using multivariate classification and variable selection algorithms. The optimized model, based on second-derivative Savitzky-Golay preprocessing and interval Successive Projections Algorithm-Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (2d-SG/iSPA-PLS-DA), achieved an overall accuracy of 91.3 %, with 93 % sensitivity and 87 % specificity. These findings underscore that ATR-FTIR spectroscopy of saliva, supported by robust variable selection strategies, provides a high-performance, reagent-free screening platform suitable for clinical triage and large-scale surveillance of respiratory pathogens.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and chemometric analysis as highly sensitive detection tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection in saliva from different types of COVID-19 severity
- Date Crossref
- 01/03/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.