TERT drives liver tumorigenesis beyond telomere elongation
Rattachement africain : fr, us, cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract We generated two mouse models, p21 ⁺/Tert and p21 ⁺/TertCi , expressing either telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) or a catalytically inactive variant under the control of the p21 promoter. By 18–20 months of age, approximately 25% of mice from both genotypes developed liver tumors with histopathological features resembling human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Whole-exome sequencing identified activating Ctnnb1 mutations and recurrent PP1 subunit alterations in p21 ⁺/Tert tumors, whereas p21 ⁺/TertCi tumors harbored activating Hras Gln61Lys mutations associated with elevated C>A transversions. Both models exhibited chromosomal aberrations commonly observed in human HCC. Transcriptomic analyses revealed that β-catenin–activated tumors recapitulated gene expression signatures of human HCC, while MAPK-mutated tumors showed profiles consistent with MAPK/ERK pathway activation. Metabolically, both genotypes demonstrated increased glycolysis and suppression of gluconeogenesis, including downregulation of FBP1, but expressed distinct NRF2 target genes. Spatial profiling further revealed reduced HNF4α-positive hepatocytes across tumors, independent of Hnf4α transcription, and markedly diminished immune cell infiltration particularly in β-catenin–activated tumors. Collectively, these findings uncover telomere-independent functions of TERT and identify molecular and metabolic features with potential relevance for predicting immunotherapy response.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- TERT drives liver tumorigenesis beyond telomere elongation
- Date Crossref
- 05/02/2026
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.