Leveraging Task FMRI Data to Extract Resting-State Metrics in Brain Tumor and Healthy Populations

Le résumé fourni par la source

PURPOSE: This study examined whether task-based functional MRI (fMRI) can provide metrics of local brain activity and hemodynamics typically derived from resting-state fMRI (rsfMRI). METHODS: Two publicly open datasets from healthy individuals and brain tumor patients were retrospectively used to compare amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) and global signal metrics, namely, global signal correlation (GSC), global signal cross-correlation (GSXC), and global signal time delay (GSTD) derived from motor and language fMRI with those from a reference rsfMRI scan (rest-1). Factors influencing the correlations between each measurement were examined using a mixed-effects model with post-hoc pairwise comparisons. RESULTS: Our study included 50 healthy subjects (mean age: 29 ± 3 years; 32 women) and 38 patients (45 ± 14 years; 24 men). Significant correlations (p < 0.001) were found for all metrics between those derived from motor, language, or a second rest scan (rest-2) against rest-1 scans for both healthy subjects and patients. Both fMRI type and motion magnitude affected the measurements of healthy subjects' GSC (fMRI type: F [2, 69.1] = 15.4, p < 0.001; motion: F [1, 123.1] = 8.5, p = 0.004), GSXC (fMRI type: F [2, 69.5] = 18.9, p < 0.001; motion: F [1, 123.2] = 9.89, p = 0.002), and GSTD (fMRI type: F [2, 58.7] = 9.89, p < 0.001; motion: F [1, 123.2] = 15.26, p < 0.001). FMRI type by motion interaction was significant for ALFF (F [2, 65.9] = 6.13, p = 0.004). The effects were less pronounced and observed only for GSC (F [2, 40.4] = 6.1, p = 0.005) and GSXC (F [2, 41.2] = 6.4, p = 0.004) in the clinical dataset. CONCLUSION: Repurposing existing task-based functional MRI data for evaluating local brain activities and hemodynamics is feasible in the entire brain in healthy and brain tumor subjects.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.