Nutritional practices and impact of feeding adequacy on clinical outcomes in Chinese respiratory intensive care units patients: a prospective observational study (ORIENT study)

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background The current status of nutritional support for patients in Respiratory ICU across mainland China remains inadequately characterized. This multi-center study, conducted in RICUs, was designed to investigate nutritional practices in this specific patient population, focusing on initiation timing, energy/protein adequacy, and associations with clinical outcomes. Methods A prospective, observational study enrolled 1,026 patients (ICU stay >48 h) across 68 Chinese RICUs. We analyzed EN initiation rates (24 h/48 h), caloric/protein intake adequacy during the first 7 days, and outcomes via multivariable Cox regression. Results EN initiation occurred in 36.8% (24 h) and 43.4% (48 h) of patients. Excluding patients who could take oral food, the proportion of patients who started EN within 24 and 48 h increased to 86.9 and 95.3%. Among 499 EN-fed patients, 26.1% developed EN complications. Caloric analysis ( n = 317) identified three trajectories: underfeeding (<70% targets, 32.5%), adequate feeding (70–110, 43.2%), and overfeeding (>110, 24.3%). Overfeeding independently predicted higher non-social infections and significantly increased mortality risk in patients >50 years (HR = 1.83, 95% CI 1.02–3.28; p = 0.04). Mean protein intake was 0.9 g/kg/day, with no 28-day mortality benefit at higher thresholds (≥1.2 g/kg: p = 0.31; ≥1.3 g/kg: p = 0.42). Conclusion This multicenter study demonstrates optimal early EN initiation rates in Chinese RICUs. Energy overfeeding was associated with increased mortality risk only in patients >50 years and non-social infections risk, whereas protein adequacy showed no outcome associations. Protocolized EN delivery balancing adequacy and overfeeding risks is urgently needed in RICUs. Clinical trial registration Identifier, NCT04958447.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.