Reviewer #1 (Public review): A quantitative pipeline for whole-mount deep imaging and analysis of multi-layered organoids across scales
Le résumé fourni par la source
Whole-mount 3D imaging at the cellular scale is a powerful tool for exploring complex processes during morphogenesis. In organoids, it allows examining tissue architecture, cell types, and morphology simultaneously in 3D models. However, cell packing in multilayered organoid tissues hinders both deep imaging and quantification of cell-scale processes. To address these challenges, we developed an experimental and computational pipeline to extract properties at scales ranging from cell to tissue. The experimental module is based on two-photon imaging of immunostained organoids. The computational module corrects for optical artifacts, performs accurate 3D nuclei segmentation and reliably quantifies gene expression. We provide the computational module as a user-friendly Python package called Tapenade, along with napari plugins which enable joint data processing and exploration across scales. We demonstrate the pipeline by quantifying 3D spatial patterns of gene expression and nuclear morphology in gastruloids, revealing how local cell deformations and gene co-expression relate to tissue-scale organization. This quantitative pipeline improves our understanding of gastruloid development, and lays the groundwork for a wide range of multi-layered organoids and tumoroids systems
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Reviewer #1 (Public review): A quantitative pipeline for whole-mount deep imaging and analysis of multi-layered organoids across scales
- Date Crossref
- 13/01/2026
- Éditeur
- eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
- Type
- peer-review
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.