P-28. Evaluation of oral antibiotic prescribing for uncomplicated Gram-Negative bloodstream infections following implementation of institutional guidance at an academic medical center
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Background Data have increasingly supported transition from intravenous (IV) to oral (PO) therapy for uncomplicated gram-negative bacteremia (uGNB). The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in transition to PO therapy over time at our institution. Methods Our antimicrobial stewardship team routinely reviews positive blood cultures and in September 2023 implemented guidance for management of uGNB. This was posted on our website and disseminated to clinicians, including hospitalists and ID physicians, encouraging best practices after susceptibilities return. Recommendations outlined selection criteria for PO therapy, preferred antibiotic regimens and total duration of 7 days. This retrospective, quasi-experimental study included immunocompetent adults at our 809-bed medical center with a first episode of uGNB during Jan-Dec 2019 (pre-cohort) compared to after guidance implementation (post-cohort, Nov 2023-Nov 2024). The primary outcome was proportion of patients transitioned to PO therapy for uGNB by day 7. Secondary outcomes included timing and choice of agent for IV to PO conversion and patient outcomes. Results There were 93 patients in the pre-cohort and 126 patients in the post-cohort (Table 1). Most had urinary tract infections with E.coli (Table 2). Before guidance, 66.9% of patients were transitioned to PO antibiotics and after it was 71.2% (p=0.46). There was a significant decrease in median days of IV therapy (4 vs 3, p=< 0.01), length of hospital stay (6 vs 4 days, p=< 0.01) and total duration of antibiotics (10 vs 8 days, p=< 0.01). Levofloxacin was the most common PO stepdown in both cohorts (56% vs 53%, Table 3). Total use of beta-lactams was similar, but after implementation more patients were prescribed agents recommended by guidance including cephalexin (2.2% vs 6.3%) and amoxicillin/clavulanate (4.3% vs 13.5%, p=0.04). Agents listed as not recommended in guidance decreased, including cefdinir (8.6% vs 1.6%, p=0.02), cefpodoxime (2.2% vs 0%), and cefuroxime (9.7% vs 1.6%, p=0.01). Conclusion Prescribing of PO stepdown antibiotic therapy for uGNB changed over time. After implementation of guidance, we observed significantly fewer days of IV antibiotics, shorter hospital stays, lower total durations, and increased use of recommended PO beta-lactams. Disclosures Trevor C. Van Schooneveld, MD, FSHEA, FIDSA, BioMerieux: Advisor/Consultant|BioMerieux: Grant/Research Support
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- P-28. Evaluation of oral antibiotic prescribing for uncomplicated Gram-Negative bloodstream infections following implementation of institutional guidance at an academic medical center
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.