Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

P-1490. Health Outcomes and Economic Burden in Commercially- and Medicaid-Insured Infants Diagnosed with Invasive Meningococcal Disease in the United States

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background While uncommon, invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is severe and progresses rapidly. In the United States (US), the highest IMD incidence rates are reported among infants. In this study, we describe health outcomes and economic burden among US infants (< 1 year) diagnosed with IMD. Methods In this retrospective study, claims data of commercially- and Medicaid-insured infants from 01/2005–12/2022 were analyzed. Infants with a primary IMD diagnosis were identified using inpatient admissions data and matched 1:5 with infants without IMD. Health outcomes were tracked, and for infants with IMD were stratified by acute phase (index date to 30 days post-discharge) and post-acute phase (from acute phase to death, insurance disenrollment, or end of study period). A variable follow-up period from index was used to assess IMD-related direct medical and out-of-pocket costs, reported per-patient per-month (PPPM). Results In the commercial (N=7.2 million) and Medicaid (N=7.4 million) cohorts, 21 and 115 infants were diagnosed with IMD, respectively. Median follow-up length across cohorts and IMD status was 426–779 days. Infants with IMD (in both acute and post-acute phases) had a higher occurrence (≥0.5%) of many negative health outcomes versus (vs.) matched infants (Table 1). IMD-related inpatient costs (mean [standard deviation]) were significantly higher in infants with IMD than matched infants (commercial: $17,095 [$41,590] vs. $7 [$48]; Medicaid: $3,750 [$15,262] vs. $22 [$228]; both p< 0.001). IMD-related office visit, specialist visit, and surgical procedure costs were significantly higher for commercially-insured infants with IMD than matched infants ($85 [$129] vs. $39 [$37]; $33 [$67] vs. $9 [$24]; $860 [$2,879] vs. $0 [$0], respectively; all p≤ 0.006), as were out-of-pocket inpatient, outpatient, and surgical procedure costs (not significant in Medicaid cohort). Other IMD-related outpatient service costs were significantly higher among infants with IMD than matched infants across cohorts. Conclusion Individuals who had IMD during infancy experienced substantial negative health outcomes and economic burden. Preventing IMD in early childhood may help to reduce negative impacts on individuals, families, and healthcare systems. Funding: GSK VEO-000995 Disclosures Oscar Herrera-Restrepo, PhD, GSK: Employee|GSK: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) Elizabeth Packnett, MPH, GSK: Grant/Research Support|Merative: Employee Megan Richards, PhD, MPH, GSK: Grant/Research Support|Merative: Employee Elise Kuylen, PhD, GSK: Employee|GSK: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) Tosin Olaiya, MBChB, MSc, GSK: Employee|GSK: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) Thatiana Pinto, PhD, GSK: employee|GSK: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) Lindsay Landgrave, PharmD, GSK: Employee|GSK: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) Andrew G. Allmon, DrPH, GSK: Employee|GSK: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company)

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
P-1490. Health Outcomes and Economic Burden in Commercially- and Medicaid-Insured Infants Diagnosed with Invasive Meningococcal Disease in the United States
Date Crossref
01/01/2026
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • GlaxoSmithKline (United States) pays non établi dans la notice
    Entreprise
  • Merit Network pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisation à but non lucratif
  • GSK pays non établi dans la notice
    Institution
  • Merative pays non établi dans la notice
    Institution

GlaxoSmithKline (United States), Merit Network et GSK, avec 1 autre affiliation.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Bacterial Infections and VaccinesCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsMigraine and Headache Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.