Formation Mechanisms of Chilled Layer on the Perimeter of Superalloy Seed
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The seeding technique is the only way to precisely control the crystal orientation of single-crystal superalloy castings. However, an inevitable assembly gap exists between the seed and the mold cavity in practice, whose role in defect formation remains insufficiently understood. To elucidate the mechanism and impact of this gap, superalloy seeds were machined to different extents, aiming to create varying gaps with the mold. After the seeding experiment, the chilled layers formed on the perimeter of the pre-processed seeds were detected, exhibiting two distinct microstructural zones: a eutectic aggregation region at the bottom and an equiaxed grain at the top. The thicker the layer, the more pronounced the differences in microstructure between these two regions. This can be explained by the fact that during preheating, the γ/γ′ eutectic-rich interdendritic region (enriched with Al + Ti + Ta) in the original seed melted first due to its lower melting point. The molten fluid flowed downward into the gap, solidifying rapidly into the chilled layer. The leading portion of the fluid, melting from the interdendritic zone, formed the eutectic zone in the lower part of the chilled layer. The subsequently poured charge alloy melt (non-enriched with Al + Ti + Ta) generated the upper equiaxed zone with only a little γ/γ′ eutectic. These equiaxed grains in the chilled layer subsequently grew upward and potentially developed into stray grains of the casting.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Formation Mechanisms of Chilled Layer on the Perimeter of Superalloy Seed
- Date Crossref
- 11/01/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.