Evidence-Based Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Advanced HER2-Positive and HER2-Low Breast Cancer in Colombia
Rattachement africain : co, cl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background/Objectives: The management of advanced HER2-positive and HER2-low breast cancer is evolving rapidly. This study aimed to generate national, evidence-based clinical recommendations for Colombia, addressing the lack of standardized local guidance. Methods: A systematic literature search (2020–2024) was conducted. The evidence was evaluated using AGREE II, RoB 2, ROBINS-I, and JBI tools. Recommendations were developed using the GRADE approach and a structured modified Delphi consensus process involving 34 national experts. Results: A total of 22 clinical recommendations were formulated. These address HER2 quantification and reporting, first-line and subsequent-line therapy, and management of brain metastases. Five recommendations (23%) were classified as strong, supported by high-certainty evidence, while 17 (77%) were conditional, reflecting the need for adaptation to local contexts and resource availability. Conclusions: This consensus provides updated, context-specific clinical guidance to optimize the care of patients with advanced HER2-positive and HER2-low breast cancer in Colombia. The recommendations are designed to standardize care, improve patient outcomes, and promote equitable access to innovative therapies within the Colombian healthcare system.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Evidence-Based Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Advanced HER2-Positive and HER2-Low Breast Cancer in Colombia
- Date Crossref
- 08/01/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.