A Single-Center Review of Renal Replacement Therapy in Patients With Acute Traumatic Brain Injury
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of morbidity, and concomitant acute kidney injury presents substantial management challenges. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is thought to cause less hemodynamic instability than intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) after TBI, but factors associated with modality selection in TBI remain unclear. We sought to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with TBI requiring renal replacement therapy and to test whether injury severity, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and comorbidity burden were associated with the receipt of CRRT vs. IHD. METHODS: This 10-year retrospective study at a level I trauma center included adult TBI patients requiring renal replacement therapy. Patients were grouped by modality (CRRT vs. IHD), and demographics, injury severity, and outcome variables were compared. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients met the inclusion criteria; 52 received IHD and 29 received CRRT. Patients receiving IHD were older (69 vs. 58 years, p=0.006) and had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores (6.6 vs. 3.5, p<0.001). Patients receiving CRRT had lower presenting GCS (8.7 vs. 13.5, p<0.001) and higher injury severity scores (24.5 vs. 16.2, p=0.006). CRRT patients had higher mortality (62.1% vs. 30.8%, p<0.001), longer hospital stays (17 vs. 8.6 days, p=0.001), and were more commonly discharged with severe disability (17.2% vs. 3.8%, p=0.001). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective cohort, we found that CRRT was more frequently used in TBI patients with worse injuries and lower levels of consciousness on presentation, whereas patients with greater comorbid burden were more likely to receive IHD. These findings highlight the need for evidence-based guidelines to inform renal replacement modality selection in acute TBI.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A Single-Center Review of Renal Replacement Therapy in Patients With Acute Traumatic Brain Injury
- Date Crossref
- 28/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Cooper University Hospital Department of General Surgery pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Neurological Surgery pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Cooper Medical School of Rowan University Department of Trauma pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Reading Hospital pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
Department of General Surgery — Cooper University Hospital, Neurological Surgery et Department of Trauma — Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, avec 1 autre affiliation.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.