Efficacy and safety of ajmaline in patients with electrical storm
Rattachement africain : de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Antiarrhythmic drug therapy is a cornerstone in managing electrical storm (ES). Data on the safety and efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs besides beta-blockers and amiodarone are limited. OBJECTIVE: This retrospective observational study aimed to assess the potential role of ajmaline in patients with ES refractory to guideline-recommended care. METHODS: Adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit owing to ES between 2013 and 2023 who received ajmaline for therapy-refractory ES were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: 46 of 332 patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (mean age 64 ± 11 years; 93% male; mean left ventricular ejection fraction 33% ± 12%; 78% with implanted implantable cardioverter-defibrillator) were treated with intravenous ajmaline. Most patients (98%) had known structural heart disease. Serious adverse events requiring discontinuation were not observed. Minor adverse events occurred in 3 patients (7%). Complete arrhythmia suppression was achieved in 34 patients (74%), partial suppression in 2 (4%), and ventricular tachycardia slowing in 5 (11%). In 5 patients (11%), ajmaline showed no effect. During hospitalization, 5 patients (11%) died: 2 (4%) because of multiorgan failure and 3 (7%) because of a combined septic and cardiogenic shock despite complete or partial arrhythmia suppression by ajmaline. 28 patients (61%) underwent catheter ablation, and 41 patients (89%) were discharged in stable rhythm. After a 6-month follow-up, 15 patients were lost to follow-up and 24 of the 26 remaining patients were still alive. CONCLUSION: In selected patients with refractory ES, intravenous ajmaline treatment was associated with a reduction in ventricular arrhythmias and a favorable safety profile. Ajmaline may serve as a valuable bridge to definitive treatment in life-threatening ES.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Efficacy and safety of ajmaline in patients with electrical storm
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
University Hospital Münster Department of Cardiology II - Electrophysiology pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
Department of Cardiology II - Electrophysiology — University Hospital Münster.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.