Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Comparative Analysis of Artificial Intelligence–Based Quantification versus Visual Rating of Enlarged Perivascular Spaces in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis Cohort

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
8Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Enlarged perivascular spaces (PVS) are fluid-filled spaces surrounding small cerebral vessels. Current PVS research has been limited by the absence of efficient and scalable quantification tools. We compared visual ratings versus artificial intelligence (AI)-based quantification in identifying associations of PVS with vascular risk factors and cognitive performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 235 participants from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis who had undergone brain MRI and had available both visual ratings and AI-derived PVS quantification. Visual ratings were performed by an expert neuroradiologist (K.D.H.) using a semiquantitative scale. AI-derived counts were based on a fully automated deep learning algorithm. Visual and AI-derived counts were grouped into 4 a priori-defined anatomic locations: basal ganglia, frontoparietal cerebrum, midbrain, and cerebellum. The relationships of PVS counts with demographic characteristics, vascular risk factors, and global and domain-specific cognitive scores were examined using ordinal logistic regression (for ordinal categoric outcomes) and linear regression (for continuous outcomes) models. RESULTS: Mean age (SD) was 72.1 (6.8) years; 95 (40%) participants were men; and 126 (54%) self-reported as black. Means (SD) of AI-derived regional PVS counts were 63.7 (24.6) for basal ganglia, 414.9 (167.5) for frontoparietal cerebrum, and 9.8 (4.4) for midbrain. On visual ratings, the most prevalent count category for each region was 11-20 for basal ganglia (40%), 21-40 (31%) for frontoparietal cerebrum, and 1-5 (83%) for midbrain. For basal ganglia PVS, while both methods were associated with older age and white race/ethnicity, AI-derived counts exhibited additional associations with higher systolic blood pressure (β, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.05-0.36) and diabetes (unstandardized β coefficient [β], 11.51; 95% CI, 3.48-19.55), as well as poorer global cognition (β, -0.012; 95% CI, -0.023 to -0.0004), delayed memory (β, -0.005; 95% CI, -0.010 to -0.0005), and attention/processing speed (β, -0.005; 95% CI, -0.009 to -0.001) cognitive performance. CONCLUSIONS: In this cross-sectional study, AI-derived PVS quantification was more sensitive in detecting associations with vascular risk factors and cognitive outcomes than traditional visual ratings. AI-based quantification may aid in the analysis of large-scale epidemiologic data, advancing PVS research.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Comparative Analysis of Artificial Intelligence–Based Quantification versus Visual Rating of Enlarged Perivascular Spaces in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis Cohort
Date Crossref
15/12/2025
Éditeur
American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Boston University Department of Neurology (J.R.R.) pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • University of Washington the Department of Epidemiology and Cardiovascular Health Research Unit (S.R.H.) pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisation à but non lucratif
  • Institute for Neurodegenerative Disorders pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisation à but non lucratif
  • Wake Forest University pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • University of Pennsylvania pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center the Vanderbilt Memory and Alzheimer's Center (T.H.) pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio From the Neuroimage Analytics Laboratory (NAL) pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • School of Medicine the Department of Neurology (R.R.) pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

Department of Neurology (J.R.R.) — Boston University, The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center et the Department of Epidemiology and Cardiovascular Health Research Unit (S.R.H.) — University of Washington, avec 7 autres affiliations.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusCardiovascular Disease and AdiposityCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.