CRISPR-Cas editing technologies for viral-mediated gene therapies of human diseases: Mechanisms, progress, and challenges
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The gene therapy landscape has evolved substantially in recent years, beginning with the approval of the first adeno-associated virus-based gene therapy, Luxterna, in 2017. Since then, the US FDA has approved nearly 30 new viral gene therapy programs, with notable examples including Zolgensma, Spinraza, Hemgenix, Zynteglo, Lyfgenia, Kymriah, Skysona, and Tecelra. Remarkably, all these products rely on delivery via adeno-associated vectors (AAVs) and lentiviral vectors (LVs). Improvements in viral-mediated gene transfer efficiency and clinical-scale manufacturing, together with immense commercial interest, have greatly propelled the clinical adoption of gene therapy products. In recent years, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and its related Cas proteins (CRISPR-Cas) have made significant advances in gene therapy, offering next-generation approaches for curative gene editing to treat genetic diseases and disorders. In this review, we examine the range of these therapeutics and their viral carriers, focusing primarily on LVs and AAVs. We provide a snapshot of the current status of the field and highlight some of the current challenges in the clinical application of gene therapy, with particular emphasis on viral CRISPR-Cas-based technologies and their future potential.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- CRISPR-Cas editing technologies for viral-mediated gene therapies of human diseases: Mechanisms, progress, and challenges
- Date Crossref
- 01/03/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.