Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Results of Multigene Panel Testing, Including PKD1, in >1,200 Patients With Cystic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Analysis

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us, fi. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Rationale & Objective Mounting evidence supports that identifying the specific molecular etiology for individuals with cystic kidney disease (CyKD) is important for prognostication, surveillance, identifying related living donors, and defining familial risk, even in cases in which a clinical diagnosis appears straightforward. In this study, we aimed to investigate the yield of genetic findings and the unique variant characteristics using multigene panel testing (MGPT) in a referral laboratory setting for an unselected population of patients with an indication of CyKD. Study Design Cross-sectional study. Setting & Participants A retrospective analysis of 1,235 genetic testing reports from patients with suspected CyKD who pursued MGPT was performed. Findings A positive result in a gene associated with CyKD was identified in 49.4% (610/1235) of patient reports, identifying 468 unique variants classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic in 20 unique genes. Variants in PKD1 , a gene complicated by homology to 6 different pseudogenes, contributed to 65.6% (400/610) of positive results. Copy number variants (CNVs) were identified in 9.5% (58/610) of positive results, with 30.4% (17/56) of deletions consisting of 4 exons or less. Variants of uncertain significance that were suspicious for being pathogenic (susVUS) were identified in 57.0% (94/165) of patients with inconclusive results. Limitations Genetic analysis was targeted to the genes included on the panel at the time of testing. As new evidence emerges supporting additional gene-disease associations, there is potential for additional positive results. Conclusions Thoughtful selection of carefully curated MGPT optimized to detect technically challenging variants can identify the molecular etiology in individuals presenting with CyKD. Further investigation of susVUS through segregation analysis in families may contribute to additional positive results. Plain-Language Summary Data informing the yield of multigene panel testing (MGPT) for individuals with cystic kidney disease (CyKD) is increasing. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed MGPT results from 1,235 individuals with suspected CyKD. A positive result in one of 20 CyKD-associated genes, including PKD1 , was identified in 49.4% (610/1235) of patient reports. Copy number variants (CNVs) accounted for 9.5% (58/610) of positive results, with 30.4% (17/56) of deletions consisting of 4 exons or less. Suspicious variants of uncertain significance were identified in 57.0% (94/165) of patients with inconclusive results. MGPT can identify the molecular etiology of CyKD and, prior to ordering, should be carefully evaluated for relevant gene content, capabilities for technically challenging genes like PKD1, sensitivity to detect CNVs, and reporting policy for variants of uncertain significance.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.

Titre Crossref
Results of Multigene Panel Testing, Including PKD1, in >1,200 Patients With Cystic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Analysis
Date Crossref
01/01/2026
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Genetic and Kidney Cyst DiseasesCystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesGenomics and Rare Diseases

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.