Lung transplantation from donation after circulatory death donors over 55 years old: A national analysis of outcomes and utilization
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Lungs from older donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors are underutilized; however, these organs may represent an opportunity to expand the donor pool. Herein, we evaluated utilization and outcomes of lung transplants using lungs from older DCD donors. Methods: Using national data from 2016 to 2024, we identified all adult DCD donors and corresponding isolated lung transplant recipients. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of lung utilization. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods were used to compare graft survival between recipients of lungs from DCD donors <55 and ≥55 years. Results: < 0.001). Ex-vivo lung perfusion (odds ratio 5.93) and higher PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio (odds ratio 1.33 per 50-point increase) were independently associated with transplantation of older DCD donor lungs. One- and three-year graft survival were similar between age groups; older donor age was not associated with increased risk of graft failure in adjusted models. Conclusions: Lungs from older DCD donors remain underutilized despite comparable outcomes. Their use is highly concentrated among a small number of centers and organ procurement organizations, suggesting that local behaviors and infrastructure strongly influence disposition. Broader adoption of ex-vivo lung perfusion and strategic recipient matching may support safe expansion of this untapped donor pool.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Lung transplantation from donation after circulatory death donors over 55 years old: A national analysis of outcomes and utilization
- Date Crossref
- 01/02/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.