Human Cytomegalovirus infection in the era of vaccine development: case series of immunocompromised patients
Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction Human Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection represents a significant health burden, particularly for immunocompromised patients, including solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients and people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH). Despite the availability of antiviral prophylaxis and treatment, prolonged therapy can lead to viral drug resistance, complicating disease management. In this study, we present a series of CMV cases in immunocompromised patients, including two SOT recipients and one PLWH patient, focusing on microbiological data, clinical presentation, and therapeutic management. Methods CMV serostatus and DNA viral load were carried out by Chemiluminescence Immunoassay (CLIA) and quantitative real-time PCR to monitor patient follow-up. Results The three patients had CMV reactivation following an immunocompromised status. The prompted antiviral treatments determined the viral infection resolution, despite CMV-related complications worsening clinical outcomes. Discussion The development of a safe and effective CMV vaccine represents a needed challenge, especially for individuals at high risk of severe CMV-related complications. However, it is difficult to achieve high CMV variability. Our findings contribute to the ongoing discussion on the importance of developing vaccines to mitigate CMV-related morbidity in vulnerable populations.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Human Cytomegalovirus infection in the era of vaccine development: case series of immunocompromised patients
- Date Crossref
- 31/10/2025
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.