Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Assessment of the need pacemaker implantation following aortic valve replacement with combined cardiac surgery

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : ru. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Aim. To evaluate the risk factors for the development of cardiac conduction disorders and to determine their significance in temporary and permanent pacemaker implantation in patients after surgical aortic valve replacement and other combined cardiac surgical interventions. Material and methods. The analysis of patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement and other combined cardiac surgical interventions for the period from January 2018 to May 2023 in Krasnoyarsk Regional Clinical Hospital was performed. Results. The correlation between the occurrence of atrioventricular block (AVB) of II-III degree and sinus node dysfunction (SND) that required temporary pacemaker and permanent pacemaker implantation in patients after surgical prosthesis of aortic valve and other combined cardiac surgical interventions was determined. After AVR and other combined cardiac interventions atrial fibrillation (AF) was detected in 107 (44.6%) patients, left bundle branch block (LBBB) and right bundle branch block (RBBB) in 8 (3.3%) patients, and first-degree AV block in 12 (5.0%) patients. The need for temporary pacemaker after surgical prosthetic aortic valve and other combined cardiac surgical interventions was in 79 (45.4%) patients. 76 (96.2%) patients underwent TCP within 2 days after surgical treatment and 3 (3.8%) patients within 72 hours. According to single-factor analysis, 4 important reasons for required temporary pacemaker were identified: atrial fibrillation (OR=2,47, 95% CI=1,31-4,46, p=0,005), age older than 58.5 years (OR=2,52, 95% CI=1,29-4,93, p=0,006), glomerular filtration rate less than 77 ml/min (OR=2,12, 95% CI =1,08-4,17, p=0,028) and atrial tachycardia (OR=8,00, 95% CI=1,04-67,92, p=0,046). Рermanent pacemaker implantation was performed in 12 (6.7%) patients, 11 (91.7%) due to complete AVB and 1 (8.3%) patient due to SVD development. Pacemaker implantation after cardiac surgery was performed in 8 (66.7%) patients from 5 to 8 days, 3 (25.0%) patients from 10 to 15 days, and 1 (8.3%) patient after 23 months. According to regression analysis, a significant sign indicating a high risk of pacemaker implantation — presence of baseline left bundle branch block (OR= 6,32, 95% CI=1,09-36,70, p=0.020). Conclusion. The identified risk factors for conduction disturbances after aortic valve replacement and other cardiac surgical interventions can be used for timely conduction and implantation of a permanent pacemaker.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Assessment of the need pacemaker implantation following aortic valve replacement with combined cardiac surgery
Date Crossref
25/10/2025
Éditeur
Silicea - Poligraf
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Krasnoyarsk Regional Clinical Hospital pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Krasnoyarsk State Medical University Krasnoyarsk Regional Clinical Hospital pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

Krasnoyarsk Regional Clinical Hospital et Krasnoyarsk Regional Clinical Hospital — Krasnoyarsk State Medical University.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Cardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesInfective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.