Development of a diagnostic model of insulin‐related lipohypertrophy for patients with diabetes mellitus
Rattachement africain : cn, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
AIMS: To develop a diagnostic model of insulin-related lipohypertrophy for patients with diabetes mellitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed. Between December 2021 and November 2022, a total of 395 diabetic patients treated with insulin were enrolled from a tertiary hospital in Tianjin, China. Demographic and clinical factors were collected, and patients were assessed for lipohypertrophy by ultrasound scanning. The rate of lipohypertrophy was investigated, and a nomogram was developed based on a logistic regression model. SPSS 26.0 and R Studio 2022.12.0+353 3.6.3 were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: 89.6% (354/395) patients were identified with lipohypertrophy. In this study, 693 lipohypertrophy sites in lipohypertrophy patients and 91.5% (634/693) lipohypertrophy were distributed at the abdomen. Self-injection, duration of insulin injection, and incorrect rotation were selected as predictors to develop a lipohypertrophy diagnosed diagnostic nomogram model of lipohypertrophy in diabetic patients treated with insulin. The accuracy, calibration, and clinical applicability of the model are good; thus, it fits well. CONCLUSIONS: A nomogram including three easily available factors (self-injection, duration of insulin injection, and incorrect rotation) was developed, and it can be used in diabetes management among diabetes patients treated with insulin.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Development of a diagnostic model of insulin‐related lipohypertrophy for patients with diabetes mellitus
- Date Crossref
- 12/10/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.