Children's drawings of intervention for childhood apraxia of speech: Place, people, activity, and emotion
Rattachement africain : au. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Sourcing and including the views of children in speech and language therapy aligns with Articles 12 and 13 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. This research explored the perspectives of 30 children (3;9–8;7 years) with childhood apraxia of speech regarding their experiences of Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing intervention. Children lived in the United States or Australia and had engaged in one of three intervention studies exploring: delivery by their parent or speech and language therapist; delivery in high or low dose; and delivery in massed or distributed format. Children shared their perspectives of intervention through drawing a picture of themselves during intervention, describing their drawings, and identifying emojis responding to questions about intervention. Five focal points were identified in the drawings: Place (73.33%: environment, intervention materials, and transitions), People (73.33%: body parts and facial expressions, relationships and connection, and sense of self), Activity (20.00%: words, talking, and listening), Emotion (53.33%: positive and negative), and Not Talking (6.67%). Many participants felt happy about ‘speech practice’ (☺ 62.50%) and who did speech practice with them (☺ 62.50%) but were divided in how they felt about the number of times (☺ 33.3%) and the length of time (☺ 29.17%) of speech practice. Children's perspectives can be considered when designing and delivering intervention.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Children's drawings of intervention for childhood apraxia of speech: Place, people, activity, and emotion
- Date Crossref
- 03/10/2025
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Australian Catholic University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Charles Sturt University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Australian Catholic University et Charles Sturt University.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.