Treatment‐Related Adverse Events and Associated Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated With Enfortumab Vedotin: Analysis of the UNITE Study

Le résumé fourni par la source

INTRODUCTION: Enfortumab vedotin-ejfv (EV), an antibody-drug conjugate approved for advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC), has limited real-world safety data and no validated predictive biomarkers. Retrospective studies suggest higher objective response rates (ORR) among patients developing EV-related dermatologic toxicities, but survival implications remain unclear. This analysis assessed the safety of EV monotherapy and the impact of dermatologic and neurologic toxicities on efficacy outcomes in a multi-institutional cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: UNITE is a multicenter, retrospective study across 16 US sites of patients with aUC treated with targeted agents, including EV. Primary endpoints were the incidence of EV treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs, any grade) and TRAE-related treatment modifications. Secondary endpoints included a comparison of ORR, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) between patients with and without dermatologic toxicities and neuropathy. To reduce immortal time bias, Cox regression models incorporated TRAEs as time-dependent covariates to adjust for EV treatment duration as well as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), hemoglobin, and liver metastases. RESULTS: Between 2018 and 2023, 485 patients with aUC received > 1 dose of EV monotherapy. Most (67%) received > 2 prior therapy lines. Any grade TRAEs occurred in 77%, most frequently neuropathy (36%) and dermatologic toxicities (27%); 57% required treatment modification and 21% discontinued EV, primarily due to neuropathy (9%) and fatigue (3%). Patients with dermatologic toxicities and neuropathy had higher ORR (56% vs. 42%; p = 0.007 and 64% vs. 35%; p < 0.0001, respectively). Neuropathy was independently associated with improved OS (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.50-0.87; p = 0.002); dermatologic TRAEs were not associated with PFS or OS benefit. CONCLUSIONS: EV safety outside clinical trials was consistent with prior reports, with no new signals. Treatment modifications were most often due to neuropathy, dermatologic toxicities, and fatigue. Both dermatologic toxicities and neuropathy correlated with higher ORR, but only neuropathy was independently associated with improved OS.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.