Insights into gastric mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma: a novel comparative study of clinicopathological features and survival outcomes
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) is a rare and histologically complex malignancy. Due to its low incidence, data on gastric MANEC (G-MANEC) are limited, and its clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis remain poorly defined. In this study, we performed a retrospective analysis of 168 G-MANEC patients and identified a median age of 64.7 years at diagnosis. Cases were classified into adenocarcinoma (AC)-predominant and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC)-predominant subtypes based on histological composition, with large-cell NEC accounting for 69.9% of NEC-predominant tumors. Patterns of lymph node metastasis (LNM) included involvement of either a single component (AC or NEC) or both components. Survival analysis revealed a median overall survival (OS) of 24 months, with 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of 72.6%, 39.5%, and 29.7%, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified tumor size, LNM, and histological subtype as independent prognostic factors. Compared with a cohort of 328 patients with pure gastric adenocarcinoma, G-MANEC cases exhibited distinct clinicopathological features-particularly in terms of tumor size, Ki-67 index, and LNM. Collectively, these findings underscore that G-MANEC is associated with significantly poorer overall survival than that of conventional gastric adenocarcinoma.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Insights into gastric mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma: a novel comparative study of clinicopathological features and survival outcomes
- Date Crossref
- 30/09/2025
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.