Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 review

Will biodiversity actions yield healthy places? A systematic review of human health outcomes associated with biodiversity‐focused urban greening

7Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
15Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us, de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract There is growing interest in using urban greening projects to support biodiversity. While there are many potential co‐benefits, the health outcomes resulting from biodiversity‐supporting activities have yet to be synthesized. We conducted a systematic review of health outcomes associated with seven biodiversity‐supporting elements, including patch size, connections, matrix quality, habitat diversity, native plants, special resources and vegetation management. We identified 1550 studies linking elements with human health. Results show that many types of biodiversity‐supporting elements are associated with a wide range of positive health outcomes. These outcomes included improved physical and mental health, increased physical activity, improved childhood development, social outcomes, and reduced exposure to harms such as sun, heat, and pollution (including light, air and noise). Other biodiversity‐supporting elements such as reducing pesticide use, native plants, and habitat diversity were associated with a smaller and more specific range of health outcomes. While most findings showed positive associations between biodiversity‐supporting elements and health, many also yielded mixed, neutral, or negative findings. Further, most identified study designs were observational, limiting our ability to uncover causality. We found that studies using a natural experimental design yielded a greater fraction of mixed, neutral, and negative findings compared to observational designs (the majority of studies) and experimental studies (largely short term in nature). These results confirm concerns about the strength of research findings built largely on correlational research designs. We also identify areas of trade‐off between biodiversity‐supporting elements and human health. These include actions that positively affect health yet negatively impact biodiversity, such as the maintenance of sports fields and trails in parks that can negatively impact habitat and disrupt wildlife behaviour. Biodiversity‐supporting elements can also negatively impact some dimensions of human health, including by increasing human–wildlife conflict, disease vectors, allergenic pollen, biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs), through and green gentrification. Our review reveals a large potential for co‐benefits for human health to come from biodiversity‐focused actions in cities. Careful attention to minimizing tensions and trade‐offs could help to reduce the potential for conflict between biodiversity and human health objectives. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Will biodiversity actions yield healthy places? A systematic review of human health outcomes associated with biodiversity‐focused urban greening
Date Crossref
23/09/2025
Éditeur
Wiley
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • San Francisco Estuary Institute pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisation à but non lucratif
  • The State University of New Jersey Rutgers pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Google (United States) pays non établi dans la notice
    Entreprise
  • University of Virginia pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Berkeley Public Health Division pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • University of California pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Texas A&M University pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • The Nature Conservancy pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisation à but non lucratif
  • Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • City University of New York pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

San Francisco Estuary Institute, Rutgers — The State University of New Jersey et Google (United States), avec 9 autres affiliations.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Urban Green Space and HealthClimate Change and Health ImpactsNoise Effects and Management

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.