Characterizing the role of extracellular domain in GLP-1R biased agonism
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The biased agonism of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) plays a key role in the efficacy and side effects of drugs used to treat type II diabetes mellitus and obesity. Despite its therapeutic potential, the mechanisms underlying GLP-1R biased agonism remain poorly understood. In this study, we investigate the role of the extracellular domain (ECD) in GLP-1R signaling bias through saturation mutagenesis at seven key sites. We examined 126 mutations and identified several that selectively abolished β-arrestin recruitment while retaining cAMP production. Additionally, we employed a large language model (LLM) to interpret the functional impacts of these mutations, uncovering correlations between sequence features and signaling outcome. These findings provide new insight into the "two-domain" model of class B1 G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), highlighting the ECD's role in biased agonism and offering novel information for designing more effective and selective GLP-1R agonists. • A comprehensive set of 126 mutations at 7 key sites in the GLP-1R ECD have been investigated • Saturation mutagenesis revealed molecular interactions between the GLP-1R ECD and peptide ligand • Mutations in the GLP-1R ECD (E68 and R121) can modulate GLP-1R signaling bias • A novel strategy to interpret relationship between mutations and signaling bias in GLP-1R has been explored
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Characterizing the role of extracellular domain in GLP-1R biased agonism
- Date Crossref
- 01/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.