Whole genome sequence analysis of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol across 246 K individuals
Résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Rare genetic variation provided by whole genome sequence datasets has been relatively less explored for its contributions to human traits. Meta-analysis of sequencing data offers advantages by integrating larger sample sizes from diverse cohorts, thereby increasing the likelihood of discovering novel insights into complex traits. Furthermore, emerging methods in genome-wide rare variant association testing further improve power and interpretability. RESULTS: Here, we conduct the largest meta-analysis of whole genome sequencing for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), a therapeutic target for coronary artery disease, analyzing data from 246 K participants and integrating 1.23B variants from the UK Biobank and the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) program. We identify numerous rare coding and non-coding gene associations related to LDL-C, with replication across 86 K participants in All of Us. Our findings are based on single-variant analyses, rare coding and non-coding variant aggregation tests, and sliding window approaches. Through this comprehensive analysis, we identify 704 novel single-variant associations, 25 novel rare coding variant aggregates, 28 novel rare non-coding variant aggregates, and one novel sliding window aggregate. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a meta-analysis framework for large-scale whole genome sequence association analyses from diverse population groups, yielding novel rare non-coding variant associations.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Whole genome sequence analysis of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol across 246 K individuals
- Date Crossref
- 09/09/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.