Green ultrasound‑assisted deep eutectic solvent extraction of flavonoid enzyme inhibitors from Blumea aromatica : process optimization, characterization, and mechanistic insights into α ‑glucosidase and tyrosinase inhibition
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
A green ultrasound-assisted deep eutectic solvent (UAE–DES) method was optimised for extracting flavonoid enzyme inhibitors from Blumea aromatica. Optimal conditions (choline chloride-1,4-butanediol 1:3 molar ratio, 43% water content, 50 mL/g liquid-to-solid ratio, 80 °C ultrasound for 48 min) yielded 3.15% total flavonoids, 45.2% higher than 50% ethanol extraction. Scanning electron microscopy confirmed cell wall disruption. The UAE–DES extract showed the strongest enzyme inhibition among all extracts tested (IC50 35.872 ± 0.294 µg/mL for α-glucosidase, 9.126 ± 0.285 μg/mL for tyrosinase), though the α-glucosidase inhibition was much weaker than acarbose, while tyrosinase inhibition was comparable to kojic acid. Six flavonoids were identified via UPLC-Q-Orbitrap HRMS, including scutellarein and corylin. Molecular docking revealed strong binding affinities (≤ −5 kcal/mol), with corylin showing the highest binding to both enzymes through hydrogen bonds and van der Waals interactions. This approach supports sustainable discovery of natural enzyme inhibitors for antidiabetic and skin-whitening applications.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Green ultrasound‑assisted deep eutectic solvent extraction of flavonoid enzyme inhibitors from <i>Blumea aromatica</i> : process optimization, characterization, and mechanistic insights into <i>α</i> ‑glucosidase and tyrosinase inhibition
- Date Crossref
- 04/09/2025
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.