The Enemies of Reliable and Useful Clinical Prediction Models: A Review of Statistical and Scientific Challenges
Rattachement africain : be, nl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The current status of applied clinical prediction modeling is poor. Many models are developed with suboptimal methods and are not evaluated, and hence have little impact on clinical care. We review 12 challenges—provocatively labeled enemies—that jeopardize the creation of prediction models that make it to clinical practice to improve treatment decisions and clinical outcomes for individual patients. The challenges cover four areas: context, data, design and analysis, and scientific culture. We provide negative examples and recommendations for improvement, but also highlight positive examples and developments. Greater awareness of the complexities surrounding clinical prediction modeling is needed among researchers, funding agencies, health professionals as end users, and all of us as potential patients. To improve the utility of prediction models for healthcare and society, we need fewer but better models as well as more resources for model validation, impact assessment, and implementation.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The Enemies of Reliable and Useful Clinical Prediction Models: A Review of Statistical and Scientific Challenges
- Date Crossref
- 09/03/2026
- Éditeur
- Annual Reviews
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.