Side-by-side evaluation of two mouse models for Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus infection
Rattachement africain : de, si. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) is the causative agent of a severe hemorrhagic fever in humans, associated with case fatality rates ranging from 10 to 40%. Due to the lack of approved vaccines or specific antiviral treatments, CCHFV is classified as a biosafety level 4 (BSL4) pathogen in most countries and designated a priority pathogen by the World Health Organization (WHO). To facilitate the preclinical assessment of medical countermeasures, we have established two murine models using C57BL/6J IFNAR −/− mice, which lack the IFNα/β receptor, infected with the phylogenetically distinct CCHFV strains Afghanistan09-2990 (Afg09) and Kosovo Hoti (Hoti). Infection with both CCHFV strains in IFNAR −/− mice resulted in significant weight loss, with Afg09 infection leading to more severe clinical disease. Quantitative analysis of viral RNA revealed widespread viral dissemination across multiple organs in both models. Detection of infectious virus varied by organ and strain. These results confirm and extend previous findings, providing a deeper understanding of CCHFV strain-specific pathogenesis in IFNAR −/− mice. Thereby, these mouse models represent valuable tools for the evaluation of antiviral therapeutics and vaccine candidates, enabling the investigation of cross-lineage protection against genetically diverse CCHFV isolates.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Side-by-side evaluation of two mouse models for Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus infection
- Date Crossref
- 22/08/2025
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.