Combining deliberative engagement with qualitative research to assess patient and caregiver perspectives on curative therapies for sickle cell disease in Africa
Rattachement africain : Tanzanie, us, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract The vast majority of individuals impacted by sickle cell disease (SCD) live in Africa, where access to potentially curative therapies such as hematopoietic stem cell transplant and gene therapies have been severely limited until now. As part of a broad effort to help prepare scientific, healthcare, and patient communities in Tanzania for the introduction of advanced SCD therapies, we sought to understand perspectives relating to curative options for SCD held by patients and their families. To achieve this, innovative qualitative research methodology was required given the highly variable level of baseline knowledge among patient communities regarding curative treatments for SCD. We therefore adopted an approach of deliberative engagement followed by traditional qualitative methods that facilitated successful identification of participants, development of research tools, and, ultimately, elicitation of valuable insights that enabled in-depth analyses. Our experience demonstrates that, when exploring perspectives relating to complex medical procedures in this population, deliberative engagement substantially enhances the outputs of qualitative research.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Combining deliberative engagement with qualitative research to assess patient and caregiver perspectives on curative therapies for sickle cell disease in Africa
- Date Crossref
- 30/07/2025
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.