Circular RNA signature of aggressive CLL with t(14;19)(q32;q13). An ERIC study
Rattachement africain : it, de, us, se, cn, cz, gb, fr, gr, es, nl, ru. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
In Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), t(14;19)(q32;q13), leading to the overexpression of BCL3, is found in ∼1% of cases and is associated with an aggressive disease. In this study, leveraging a large CLL patient cohort collected thanks to an international collaboration, we investigate for the first time the circular transcriptome (circRNAome) associated with the rare t(14;19), in comparison with CLL without t(14;19) and B cells of age-matched healthy donors. We described the circRNAs commonly dysregulated in CLL, including circCSNK1G3 and circEXOC6B(3–5), which were depleted, and circZNF609 and circLPAR3, which were overexpressed in malignant cells. Of importance, we disclosed the circRNA signature of CLL with t(14;19), formed by circRNAs with expression significantly altered specifically in link with this lesion, ectopically expressed like circCDK14(3–4), circCORO1C, circCLEC2D, and circEMB, or downregulated like circCEP70(3–6). Several of these molecules were previously shown to be dysregulated or play a role in cancer, whereas most of the signature circRNAs deserve further investigation. CLL patients with high circCORO1C and circCLEC2D expression had significantly worse clinical outcomes, with shorter time to first treatment and overall survival. This study disclosed new molecular features of the aggressive CLL subtype with t(14;19).
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Circular RNA signature of aggressive CLL with t(14;19)(q32;q13). An ERIC study
- Date Crossref
- 22/07/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.