Abuse Liability Assessment of the RELX Infinity ® Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Among Adult Smokers and Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Users
Rattachement africain : cn, gb, ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Summary Rationale Nicotine pharmacokinetics and subjective effects are important factors in assessing the abuse liability of tobacco products such as electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). In addition, an abuse liability determination is informative in assessing the ability of ENDS to support switching from cigarette smoking. Objectives To assess nicotine pharmacokinetics, subjective effects, and short-term safety profiles of the RELX Infinity ENDS compared with other tobacco/nicotine products among current smokers and ENDS users. Methods Two similar but independent studies were conducted to assess the abuse liability of Infinity tobacco-and menthol-flavored ENDS compared with combustible cigarettes and nicotine replacement therapy gum in smokers and compared with usual brand ENDS in ENDS users. Results In smokers, nicotine delivery (in terms of C max and AUC) from both Infinity ENDS flavors was lower than that from combustible cigarettes but higher than that from nicotine gum. Use of Infinity ENDS robustly reduced urges to smoke and elicited subjective effects such as satisfaction which were intermediate to those of cigarettes and nicotine gum. In ENDS users, Infinity ENDS delivered nicotine comparably to subjects’ usual brand ENDS and elicited generally similar subjective effects. Conclusions The abuse liability of two flavors of the RELX Infinity ENDS is lower than that of combustible cigarettes, higher than that of nicotine gum, and similar to that of other ENDS products. This supports a potential positive role in tobacco harm reduction, by providing smokers with a satisfying alternative to combustible cigarettes which could support switching away from smoking to a degree better than the support provided by nicotine gum while presenting a lower initiation/addiction risk among nicotine non-users than currently marketed tobacco products.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Abuse Liability Assessment of the RELX Infinity <sup>®</sup> Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Among Adult Smokers and Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Users
- Date Crossref
- 01/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.