Innovations in clinical PET image reconstruction: advances in Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm and deep learning
Rattachement africain : jp, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Recent advances in PET image reconstruction have focused on achieving high image quality and quantitative accuracy. Bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL) algorithms, such as Q.Clear and HYPER Iterative that have been integrated into commercial PET systems offer robust image noise suppression and edge preservation through regularization. In parallel, methods based on deep learning such as SubtlePET, AiCE, uAI ® HYPER DLR, and Precision DL have emerged primarily as post-processing techniques. They use trained convolutional neural networks to reduce image noise while preserving lesion contrast. These methods have reduced image acquisition times or reduced radiotracer doses while maintaining diagnostic confidence. uAI ® HYPER DPR represents a hybrid approach by embedding deep learning in iterative reconstruction. This review summarizes the technical principles and the clinical performance of BPL and deep learning-based PET reconstruction algorithms, and discusses key considerations such as image quality and quantitative accuracy of PET images. This review should deepen understanding of advanced PET image reconstruction techniques and accelerate their clinical implementation across diverse PET imaging applications.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Innovations in clinical PET image reconstruction: advances in Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm and deep learning
- Date Crossref
- 18/07/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.