Pulmonary Carcinoids: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach
Rattachement africain : it, ch. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Pulmonary carcinoids (PCs) are rare tumors, with an incidence ranging from 0.2 to 2 cases per 100,000 population per year. They account for 1–2% of all invasive pulmonary malignancies and represent approximately one-fourth to one-third of all well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) in the body. PCs are generally classified as low- to intermediate-grade malignant tumors, further subdivided into typical carcinoid (TC) and atypical carcinoid (AC), respectively. These tumors exhibit neuroendocrine morphology and differentiation, originating from mature cells of the pulmonary diffuse neuroendocrine system. Traditionally, they are categorized as central or peripheral based on their location relative to the bronchial tree; however, they can arise anywhere within the lung parenchyma. Over 40% of cases may be detected incidentally on a standard chest X-ray, although contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) remains the diagnostic gold standard. Surgical resection is the treatment of choice for PC, with the goal of complete tumor removal while preserving as much healthy lung tissue as possible. In contrast, advanced cases are typically not amenable to surgery, and medical management is focused on controlling hormone-related symptoms and limiting tumor progression. This review aims to provide an overview of the current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to pulmonary carcinoids.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Pulmonary Carcinoids: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach
- Date Crossref
- 14/07/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.