Circulating miRNAs Signature as a Predictor of Cachexia in Chronic Heart Failure: Diagnostic and Prognostic Implications
Rattachement africain : pl, it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Cachexia is defined as a complex wasting syndrome characterized by progressive weight loss, muscle wasting and a systemic inflammatory response. The incidence of cachexia in the course of cardiovascular diseases ranges from 8 to 42% depending on the applied diagnostic criteria. In clinical practice, it most commonly accompanies chronic heart failure (CHF) affecting up to 40% of patients [ 1 , 2 ]. The presence of the wasting syndrome negatively impacts patient outcomes, cardiac function, quality of life and survival, thus early identification of patients susceptible to cachexia is a key clinical goal [ 3 ]. It has been proven that systemic inflammation has a fundamental role in the CHF development, progression and its further complications. Moreover, surge in proinflammatory cytokines during CHF, including tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1 (IL-1) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) is believed to promote both progressive muscle wasting and adipocyte lipolysis contributing to malnutrition, and eventually cachexia [ 4 ]. Beyond the inflammatory conception, the pathogenesis of cachexia accompanying CHF includes upregulation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, altered appetite, reduced nutrient absorption, cardiomyocyte dysfunction and diminished myocardial perfusion [ 2 , 5 ].
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Circulating miRNAs Signature as a Predictor of Cachexia in Chronic Heart Failure: Diagnostic and Prognostic Implications
- Date Crossref
- 10/07/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.