Mepolizumab Reduces Inflammatory Eosinophils in Nasal Polyp Tissue and Restores Histological Alterations

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Eosinophilic inflammation and IL-5 are key therapeutic targets in type 2 chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). Based on surface expression of CD62L, 2 eosinophil subpopulations, homeostatic and inflammatory, were recently described. Objectives: First, we aimed to investigate the association between these subpopulations and the severity of CRSwNP, and second, to analyze the impact of mepolizumab on tissue eosinophil subpopulations. METHODS: Flow cytometry of nasal polyp (NP) tissue eosinophil subpopulations (CD62Llow, iEos; CD62Lbright, rEos) was performed in 15 CRSwNP patients (with and without severe asthma) treated with mepolizumab for a median of 7.5 months. NP tissue was analyzed at baseline and after the start of therapy. The correlation between the proportion of tissue iEos and the severity of CRSwNP and treatment response was assessed. RESULTS: The proportion of tissue iEos correlated with higher CRSwNP severity scores and quality of life questionnaire scores (SNOT-22, L-K score) at baseline. A higher and significant improvement in NPS was observed in patients who had been taking mepolizumab for longer than 6 months. Mepolizumab significantly reduced the proportion of iEos in nasal polyp tissue, although a significantly higher number of rEos remained. A greater reduction in tissue iEos was associated with a more significant improvement in quality of life (SNOT-22) and severity (L-K) scores. Finally, in addition to the reduction in tissue eosinophils, mepolizumab induced histological changes characterized by the decrease in edema and goblet cell hyperplasia. CONCLUSIONS: Tissue iEos values correlate with poor sinonasal control in CRSwNP and are reduced by treatment with mepolizumab. A greater decrease in iEos is associated with a significantly greater therapeutic effect of mepolizumab.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.