Self-Management at Work’s Moderating Effect on the Relations Between Psychosocial Work Factors and Well-Being
Rattachement africain : ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Mental health self-management (MHS) strategies may help workers with mental health concerns preserve and enhance their well-being. However, little research has explored how these strategies may help mitigate the effects of negative psychosocial work factors (PWFs) on well-being outcomes. This cross-sectional study investigated (1) the relationship between PWFs and well-being, (2) the association between MHS at work and well-being, and (3) the moderating role of self-management in preventing negative PWFs' deleterious effects. A sample of 896 Francophone workers in Canada completed a questionnaire that included self-reported measures related to workplace, self-management, and well-being. Structural equation modeling (conducted via the MPlus software, version 8.6) revealed that psychological demands were negatively related to positive well-being outcomes and positively associated with adverse well-being outcomes. Competency-related autonomy was positively associated with flourishing, and recognition was positively associated with flourishing and positive well-being at work, as well as being negatively associated with burnout and depression. Surprisingly, supervisor support was negatively related to positive well-being and positively related to burnout and depression. MHS was positively associated with positive well-being at work, flourishing, and work performance, but had no relationship with negative mental health. MHS significantly moderated the relationship between each PWF and well-being at work in both beneficial and adverse ways, depending on the specific well-being indicator being considered. From a workplace well-being perspective, this suggests that although self-management may help workers preserve and enhance their positive well-being, organizations must also directly target PWFs to prevent negative well-being outcomes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Self-Management at Work’s Moderating Effect on the Relations Between Psychosocial Work Factors and Well-Being
- Date Crossref
- 03/07/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Université Laval Department of Industrial Relations pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Champlain Regional College pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Université de Sherbrooke Department of Psychology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
College Ahuntsic pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Université de Montréal Department of Political Science pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
VITAM—Sustainable Health Research Centre pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
-
CERVO Brain Research Centre pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
Department of Industrial Relations — Université Laval, Champlain Regional College et Department of Psychology — Université de Sherbrooke, avec 4 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.