Estimated Foetal Weight Versus Abdominal Circumference in Predicting Adverse Outcome in Foetal Growth Restriction
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT Objective To identify foetal growth restriction (FGR) based on estimated foetal weight (EFW) < 10th percentile, abdominal circumference (AC) < 10th percentile or both EFW and AC < 10th percentile. To determine which group(s) is associated with a higher risk for adverse neonatal outcomes in singleton FGR pregnancies. Study Design Retrospective cohort study of singleton deliveries with prenatal FGR diagnosis at a single tertiary hospital system 1/1/2021–12/31/2021. FGR was defined as: EFW < 10th percentile only (EFW group), AC < 10th percentile only (AC group), or both EFW/AC < 10th percentile at initial diagnosis (EFW/AC group). The primary composite neonatal outcome includes urgent caesarean section delivery, APGAR < 6 at 1 or 5 min, NICU admission, stillbirth, or neonatal death. Results A total of 647 patients met inclusion criteria (EFW: 168, AC: 139, EFW/AC: 340) and no differences were observed in maternal demographics between groups. The composite neonatal outcome occurred at a higher frequency in EFW (36.3%) and EFW/AC (37.8%) groups compared to AC group alone (22.3%) ( p = 0.004). Gestational age at delivery in days was earlier in EFW/AC group (264 [258, 273]) compared to EFW (267 [259, 273]) and AC (269 [264, 274]) groups ( p < 0.001). Although not reaching statistical significance, there was higher rate of preeclampsia with severe features in the EFW/AC group (20%) compared to the EFW (13.1%) or AC groups (13.7%) ( p = 0.078). Conclusions EFW and EFW/AC groups were associated with a higher risk of adverse neonatal outcomes compared to the AC group. Delivery occurred earlier in pregnancies diagnosed with FGR based on EFW and EFW/AC compared to the AC group. These findings can inform risk counselling in pregnancies diagnosed with FGR.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Estimated Foetal Weight Versus Abdominal Circumference in Predicting Adverse Outcome in Foetal Growth Restriction
- Date Crossref
- 01/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.