Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and typhoid conjugate vaccine introduction on typhoid fever in Nepal
Rattachement africain : np, us, ca, th. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT Background While typhoid conjugate vaccines (TCV) offer promise for reducing risk in endemic settings, their population-level impact remains unclear. In 2022, Nepal introduced TCV nationally on the heels of the COVID-19 pandemic, which disrupted healthcare services, surveillance, and potentially typhoid transmission dynamics, complicating vaccine impact evaluation. We investigated the impact of TCV introduction amid shifting typhoid burden during the pandemic. Methods We analyzed blood culture data from four Kathmandu Valley health facilities, comparing culture positivity for Salmonella Typhi across three periods: pre-pandemic (January 2018-March 2020); pandemic, pre-vaccine introduction (April 2020-April 2022); post-vaccine introduction (May 2022-April 2024). We used multivariable logistic regression to assess S . Typhi positivity, adjusting for month and site, stratified by TCV-eligible children and older, TCV-ineligible populations. Results Between January 2018 and April 2024, 62,236 blood cultures were performed. S . Typhi blood culture positivity decreased from 2.11% pre-pandemic to 0.59% during the pandemic (p < 0.001) and remained low at 0.69% after TCV introduction. Among TCV-eligible children (15 months to 15 years), odds of S . Typhi positivity during the pandemic were 47% lower than the pre-COVID period (aOR 0.53, 95% CI 0.29-0.90) and continued to decrease by 76% post-TCV introduction (aOR 0.24, 95% CI 0.10-0.55). In contrast, among vaccine-ineligible individuals (≥16 years), odds of positivity during the pandemic were 78% lower than the pre-COVID period (aOR 0.22, 95% CI 0.16-0.30) but increased by 59% following TCV rollout (aOR 1.59, 95% CI 1.13-2.27). Sensitivity analyses restricted to pathogen-positive cultures yielded similar results. Conclusion S . Typhi blood culture positivity declined sharply during the pandemic before TCV introduction. The subsequent rollout of TCV substantially reduced typhoid burden in vaccine-eligible children; however, rising cases among older, vaccine-ineligible populations following the relaxation of pandemic measures highlights the need for additional control measures such as improved water and sanitation infrastructure and broader age eligibility for typhoid vaccination. AUTHOR SUMMARY Typhoid fever is a serious illness caused by bacteria that spread through contaminated food and water. In 2022, Nepal introduced a new typhoid vaccine for children, just as the country was recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic transformed how people accessed healthcare and may have also affected how typhoid spread. We wanted to understand how both the pandemic and the vaccine rollout influenced typhoid infections over time. Using results from four hospitals in the Kathmandu Valley between 2018 and 2024, we compared the number of typhoid cases before the pandemic, during the pandemic before typhoid vaccine introduction, and after typhoid vaccine introduction. We found that typhoid cases dropped sharply during the pandemic, even before the typhoid vaccine introduced. After the vaccine was introduced, typhoid continued to decline in children who were eligible for the vaccine. However, cases increased in people who were not vaccinated. Our findings show that the vaccine helped protect the age group that received it, but highlights the need for additional interventions such as improvements to sanitation and clean water infrastructure, and expanding vaccine access to more age groups to control typhoid in the future.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and typhoid conjugate vaccine introduction on typhoid fever in Nepal
- Date Crossref
- 18/06/2025
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Dhulikhel Hospital Center for Infectious Disease Research and Surveillance pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Kathmandu University Department of Community Medicine pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
Stanford University Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Civil Service Hospital pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Bir Hospital Department of Pathology pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Hanby Environmental (United States) pays non établi dans la noticeEntreprise
-
Sabin Vaccine Institute pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisation à but non lucratif
-
Toronto General Hospital pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Mahidol University Department of Microbiology and Immunology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
-
University of California Department of Public Health Sciences pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Center for Infectious Disease Research and Surveillance — Dhulikhel Hospital, Department of Community Medicine — Kathmandu University et Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital, avec 9 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.