Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

23 | RADIOTHERAPY IMPROVES PROGRESSION‐FREE SURVIVAL FOR STAGE IA NLPHL: A RETROSPECTIVE REPORT FROM THE GLOBAL NLPHL ONE WORKING GROUP (GLOW)

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
65Institutions déclarées
11Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us, de, sa, gb, au, ca, om, it, dk, ru, fr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

were 16-60 years, with a previously untreated advanced HL (Ann Arbor stage III, IV or high risk IIB) and were randomly assigned to a treatment strategy driven by PET after 2 escalated BEACOPP cycles (PET2).TMTV was calculated by summing the metabolic volumes of individual lesions segmented using the 41% SUVmax thresholding method and Dmax was defined as the maximum distance between tumoral voxels within the TMTV segmentation, normalised by body surface area.PET2 evaluations were interpreted using modified Deauville score (partial response if residual uptake > 140% liver background).Xtile analysis was used to define the optimal cutoff for survival prediction, and tested by using a training/validation method.Cox-regression models and Kaplan Meier estimates were used to analyse the TMTV and Dmax impact on progression-free survival (PFS).Results: 721 patients with a median age at diagnosis of 30 years were included and randomly assigned in a training and validation set with the same number of events.Median TMTV was 210 mL (9-2235) and median Dmax was 401 mm -1 (79-957).From a training set (n = 361) optimal cutoffs have been identified: 220 mL cut-off for TMTV (p = 0.04) and 325 mm -1 for Dmax (p = 0.01).In a validation set (n = 360), TMTV did not reach significance on PFS analysis (p = 0.18), while high Dmax was still significantly associated with a poorer PFS (p = 0.019).In the whole population, high TMTV and high Dmax were associated with a poor outcome (3 years PFS 85% vs. 91% Logrank p = 0.0012 HR = 1.98 and 85% vs. 91% HR = 2.14 Logrank p = 0.0002 respectively).PET2 positivity was also associated with a poor outcome (3 years PFS from PET2 73% vs. 91% (p < 0.0001); HR = 2.82 (95% CI: 1.78-4.46);p < 0.0001).In multivariate analysis TMTV (p < 0.05), Dmax (p < 0.025) and PET2 (p = 0.0002) were independent factors predicting PFS overcoming the IPS prognosis value.By combining TMTV, Dmax and PET2, 3 groups could be identified: patients with either [3 factors: high-TMTV, high-Dmax and PET2þ (High risk group: n = 29; 4%)], or [one or two of these factors (n = 408; 57%)], or [0 factor: low-TMTV low Dmax and PET2-(n = 284; 39%)] had a 69%, 86%, 95% 3 years-PFS respectively (p < 0.0001) (Figure 1).Conclusions: TMTV, Dmax and PET2 are independent predictors of young advanced HL patients outcomes allowing to identify 3 subsets of HL patients with significantly different outcomes that may help clinicians to better tailor therapy.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
23 | RADIOTHERAPY IMPROVES PROGRESSION‐FREE SURVIVAL FOR STAGE IA NLPHL: A RETROSPECTIVE REPORT FROM THE GLOBAL NLPHL ONE WORKING GROUP (GLOW)
Date Crossref
01/06/2025
Éditeur
Wiley
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

St. Jude Children's Research HospitalUniversity of RochesterUniversity of CologneGerman Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Study GroupEssen University HospitalUniversity Hospital MünsterKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research CentreThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterUniversity of Colorado DenverOxford University Hospitals NHS TrustStanford UniversityPeter MacCallum Cancer CentrePrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of ChicagoDuke UniversityBeatson West of Scotland Cancer CentreDana-Farber Cancer InstituteUniversity of PennsylvaniaYale UniversityRoyal HospitalBaker Hughes (Canada)University of TurinRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer CenterCopenhagen University HospitalNorfolk and Norwich University HospitalNewcastle upon Tyne HospitalIndiana University School of MedicineIndiana University – Purdue University IndianapolisPhoenix Children's HospitalVanderbilt University Medical CenterUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS TrustGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustManchester University NHS Foundation TrustDmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and ImmunologyPeoples' Friendship University of RussiaBoston Children's HospitalJacksonville CollegeUniversity of FloridaMayo Clinic in FloridaJohns Hopkins UniversityAustralian National UniversityFederico II University HospitalInstitut CurieBirmingham Children's HospitalUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity College LondonAustralasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma GroupOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research CentreAustin HealthEastern HealthThe University of SydneyConcord Repatriation General HospitalFiona Stanley HospitalMonash HealthMonash UniversityThe University of Western AustraliaSir Charles Gairdner HospitalThe University of MelbourneSt Vincent's Hospital MelbourneUNSW SydneyThe University of Notre Dame AustraliaThe University of QueenslandToowoomba HospitalLiverpool Hospital

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Advanced Radiotherapy TechniquesLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentAdvances in Oncology and Radiotherapy

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.