Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Conservative Oxygen Therapy in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Adult Patients

41Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
19Institutions déclarées
3Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Importance: Supplemental oxygen is frequently given to patients in intensive care units (ICUs); however, there is insufficient evidence to guide its therapeutic use and to minimize the potential harm caused by administering too little or too much. Objective: To determine whether reducing exposure to supplemental oxygen through a strategy of conservative oxygen therapy by using a peripheral oxygen saturation (Spo2) target of 90% (range, 88%-92%) reduces mortality at 90 days in mechanically ventilated adult patients receiving supplemental oxygen in the ICU. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, pragmatic, randomized clinical trial conducted in 97 ICUs in the UK including 16 500 mechanically ventilated patients receiving supplemental oxygen. Participants were enrolled between May 2021 and November 2024. Follow-up was completed in February 2025. Interventions: Participants randomized to conservative oxygen therapy (n = 8258) received the lowest fraction of inspired oxygen possible to maintain their Spo2 at 90%. Participants randomized to usual oxygen therapy (n = 8242) received oxygen therapy at the discretion of the treating clinician. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included duration of ICU and acute hospital stay among survivors, days alive and free from organ support at 30 days, and mortality at other time points. Results: Of 16 500 randomized patients, primary outcome data were available for 16 394 (8211 in the conservative and 8183 in the usual oxygen therapy group). Randomized groups were similar (median age, 60 [IQR, 48-71] years and 38.2% females in both groups [n = 5652]). Exposure to supplemental oxygen was 29% lower for participants in the conservative oxygen therapy group compared with the usual oxygen therapy group. By 90 days, 2908 participants (35.4%) in the conservative oxygen therapy group had died compared with 2858 (34.9%) in the usual oxygen therapy group. After adjustment for prespecified baseline variables, the risk difference was 0.7 percentage points (95% CI, -0.7 to 2.0; P = .28). There were no significant differences in durations in ICU or hospital stay, days alive and free from organ support at 30 days, or mortality at other time points. Conclusions and Relevance: In adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation and supplemental oxygen in the ICU, minimizing oxygen exposure through conservative oxygen therapy did not significantly reduce all-cause mortality at 90 days. Trial Registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN13384956.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Conservative Oxygen Therapy in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Adult Patients
Date Crossref
05/08/2025
Éditeur
American Medical Association (AMA)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Respiratory Support and MechanismsSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentNosocomial Infections in ICU

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.