A case of non-HIV pneumocystis pneumonia in a patient with cirrhosis-associated immune dysfunction
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
A 55-year-old man with a 13-year history of alcohol-related cirrhosis was admitted for the management of refractory ascites. On day 4 of hospitalization, he developed dyspnea, and chest computed tomography (CT) revealed ground-glass opacities and reticular shadows in both lungs, predominantly in the left upper lobe. Aspiration pneumonia was initially suspected, and cefmetazole was administered. However, by day 11, his respiratory status deteriorated, with SpO₂ dropping to 90%. A follow-up chest CT showed progression of bilateral ground-glass opacities. Further testing revealed an elevated β-D-glucan level of 142.5 pg/mL and KL-6 level of 1.770 U/mL, along with a positive sputum PCR for Pneumocystis jirovecii, confirming a diagnosis of pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP). As human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing was negative, he was diagnosed with non-HIV PCP. Despite treatment with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and hydrocortisone, he died on day 17. Notably, his peripheral lymphocyte count was below 500/μL before admission, suggesting that cirrhosis-associated immune dysfunction (CAID) contributed to his susceptibility to non-HIV PCP. This case highlights the importance of monitoring peripheral lymphocyte counts in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis, as CAID may increase the risk of life-threatening infections such as non-HIV PCP.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A case of non-HIV pneumocystis pneumonia in a patient with cirrhosis-associated immune dysfunction
- Date Crossref
- 03/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.