Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 conference-abstract

Efficacy and safety of regorafenib combination with PD-1 inhibitors vs. regorafenib monotherapy in second-line treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma after failure of different first-line treatments: A multicenter retrospective real-world study.

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

4088 Background: Regorafenib is the first oral targeted drug as a second-line agent in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who progressed on sorafenib treatment.There is a lack of data to validate the second-line therapy after progression of targeted-immune combination therapy. Our aim was to investigate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib alone or in combination with a programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor in second-line treatment for patients who have failed tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in combination with PD-1 or TKI monotherapy, respectively. Methods: A total of 288 patients were enrolled in this multicenter, retrospective study. These patients received regorafenib with or without PD-1 inhibitor (Sintilimab/Camrelizumab/Pembrolizumab) as second-line therapy after failure of TKI (sorafenib/lenvatinib) or such TKIs combined with PD-1 inhibitor (Sintilimab/Camrelizumab/Pembrolizumab). The primary study endpoint was the evaluation of overall survival (OS), while secondary study endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment safety. Results: In the first line treatment, 126 patients received TKI and 162 patients received TKI plus PD-1. In the TKI cohort, the Reg-PD-1 group exhibited markedly higher ORR (29.69% vs 4.84%; p<0.001) and DCR (89.06% vs 67.74%; p=0.004), as well as longer median PFS (10.5 vs 4.7 months; p<0.001) and median OS (18.9 vs 14.0 months; p=0.03) compared to the Reg monotherapy group.There was no significant difference in PFS, OS, ORR, and DCR between the two groups in the TKI plus PD-1 cohort.The incidence of AEs was higher in the Reg-PD-1 group compared to the Reg group (81.25 % vs 58.06%; p=0.005) in the TKI cohort. And Reg-PD-1 group was comparable to Reg group (76.70% vs 66.10%; p=0.144) in the TKI Plus PD-1 cohort. Conclusions: Regorafenib plus PD-1 may enhance efficacy in uHCC patients who failed first-line TKI therapy. However, in patients who have progressed after first-line TKI plus PD-1 therapy, using regorafenib alone or in combination with PD-1 in second-line therapy does not show a significant difference in efficacy.These findings have significant implications for the selection of second-line treatment strategies for HCC patients, indicating that the combination of regorafenib and PD-1 might not provide additional benefits in certain patient subgroups. Outcomes in the two cohorts. Outcomes TKI TKI plus PD-1 Reg(n=62) Reg-PD-1 (n=64) P value Reg (n=59) Reg-PD-1 (n=103) P value CR 2 3 - 3 2 - PR 1 16 - 6 21 - SD 39 38 - 35 62 - PD 20 7 - 15 18 - ORR 4.84% 29.69% <0.001 15.25% 22.33% 0.276 DCR 67.74% 89.06% 0.004 74.58% 82.52% 0.227 PFS(m) 4.7 10.5 <0.001 6.3 9.2 0.062 OS(m) 14.0 18.9 0.03 13.2 16.2 0.13

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Efficacy and safety of regorafenib combination with PD-1 inhibitors vs. regorafenib monotherapy in second-line treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma after failure of different first-line treatments: A multicenter retrospective real-world study.
Date Crossref
01/06/2025
Éditeur
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Chinese PLA General Hospital pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Guiyang Medical University pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Anhui Medical University pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • The 5th Medical Center of PLA General Hospital Comprehensive Liver Cancer Center pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Guizhou Medical University pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • The Fifth Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital Department of Radiology pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé

Chinese PLA General Hospital, Guiyang Medical University et Anhui Medical University, avec 3 autres affiliations.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisColorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.