Filifactor alocis Pathogenicity Requires TLR2 and the Oral Microbiome
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Enrichment of the oral microorganism Filifactor alocis is strongly associated with the progression of periodontitis. However, F. alocis is part of a complex dysbiotic microbial community, and the organism’s direct pathogenic potential remains uncharacterized. Using the oral gavage model of experimental periodontitis, we revealed that F. alocis promotes alveolar bone loss, as well as significant overexpression of proinflammatory markers associated with osteoclastogenesis and inflammation in oral tissues. Interestingly, despite colonizing in low abundance, F. alocis infection promoted the perturbation of the homeostatic oral microbial community toward a dysbiotic state. Systemically, high levels of proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and antibody titers against F. alocis were detected in the sera of infected animals. Germ-free mice or TLR2-deficient mice did not develop alveolar bone loss when infected with F. alocis , demonstrating that the commensal microbial community and the presence of TLR2 are required for F. alocis to display its pathogenic potential. These findings identify F. alocis as an oral pathogen that can disrupt the homeostatic relationship between the host and the oral microbiome, causing inflammation and alveolar bone resorption. Our findings provide novel insights into the pathogenic potential of F. alocis in periodontitis.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- <i>Filifactor alocis</i> Pathogenicity Requires TLR2 and the Oral Microbiome
- Date Crossref
- 12/05/2025
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.