What Guides Organizations’ Current Dementia-Related Practices Across Four Canadian Provinces?
Rattachement africain : ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
We conducted a survey to learn what guides current dementia-related practice to support community-dwelling adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities who may be experiencing dementia in Canada. We invited organizations working in health, disability, or senior sectors in 4 Canadian provinces to complete an online cross-sectional survey between April and July 2023. A total of 173 people completed the survey, representing 125 unique organizations, and nearly half resided in Ontario. The most common support and services provided to adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families were related to residential care, day programming, and group home living. Half of our survey respondents reported that they followed dementia-related practice guidelines. The most common guideline followed and early detection tool used were from the National Task Group on Intellectual Disabilities and Dementia Practices and the National Task Group-Early Detection and Screen for Dementia, respectively. Lack of awareness about guidelines and detection tools, challenges to implement the same, and organizational needs for future training and service provision were identified. Commitment to resources to monitor adults with IDD who may be experiencing dementia is recommended to provide meaningful support and service to them and their families.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- What Guides Organizations’ Current Dementia-Related Practices Across Four Canadian Provinces?
- Date Crossref
- 26/04/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.