Evaluating Population Normalization Methods Using Chemical Data for Wastewater-Based Epidemiology: Insights from a Site-Specific Case Study

Le résumé fourni par la source

Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) has been widely employed to track the spread of human pathogens; however, correlating wastewater data with clinical surveillance remains challenging due to population variability and environmental factors affecting wastewater composition. This study evaluated different SARS-CoV-2 normalization methods, comparing static population estimates with dynamic normalization based on common physicochemical parameters: chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), and ammonia (NH4-N). Wastewater samples were collected from four urban wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in northwestern Tuscany (Italy) from February 2021 to March 2023. The correlations between normalized viral loads and clinical COVID-19 cases were highest for static normalization (ρ = 0.405), followed closely by dynamic normalization using COD and BOD5 (ρ = 0.378 each). Normalization based on NH4-N was less effective. These findings suggest that chemical parameters, particularly COD and BOD5, offer a valid alternative for viral normalization when population estimates or flow rate measurements are unavailable. These parameters provide a cost-effective and practical approach for improving WBE reliability, particularly in resource-limited settings. Our results reinforce the importance of normalization in WBE to enhance its representativeness and applicability for public health surveillance.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.