The effect of diluted 1% baby shampoo on biofilm reduction in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis
Rattachement africain : my. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background Biofilm has been identified as the contributing factor for refractory chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). Nasal douching using baby shampoo was thought to be effective in patients with CRSwNP. We aimed to study the in-vitro reduction of biofilm using diluted 1% baby shampoo. Methods Sixty nasal polyps taken from patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were sent for histopathological examination using haematoxylin and eosin staining. Another portion of the same samples was sent for tissue culture and tissue culture plate assay to identify S. aureus and P. aeruginosa and determine their biofilm forming capacity. The efficacy of diluted 1% baby shampoo versus normal saline was tested on the biofilm in vitro where the optical density readings were compared pre- and post-treatment. Results The prevalence of biofilm in patients with CRSwNP is 21.7%. Thirteen samples were positive for biofilm; P. aeruginosa 23% (n = 3), S. aureus 15% (n = 2), no bacterial growth 54% (n = 7) and others 8% (n = 1). Biofilm formation was significant in both S. aureus and P. aeruginosa (p < 0.001) whilst a significant reduction of biofilm was seen in diluted 1% baby shampoo (p = 0.043). Conclusion In conclusion, diluted 1% baby shampoo is an effective treatment in the reduction of biofilm for CRSwNP.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The effect of diluted 1% baby shampoo on biofilm reduction in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis
- Date Crossref
- 24/04/2025
- Éditeur
- PeerJ
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.