Whole genome sequencing informs SNP-based breeding strategies to safeguard genetic diversity in captive African lions
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: ) face severe population declines, making captive breeding programs essential for conservation. However, genetic data scarcity in such programs elevates inbreeding risks and threatens genetic diversity. Methods: Using next-generation sequencing (NGS), we analyzed genome-wide genetic markers from 10 captive African lions at Xinjiang Tianshan Wildlife Park. We identified high-confidence SNPs, evaluated population structure, and calculated kinship/inbreeding coefficients alongside identity by descent (IBD) and identity by state (IBS) analyses. Results: We identified 5,051,795 high-confidence SNPs. The population contained distinct genetic subgroups. Six lion pairs exhibited elevated kinship coefficients, with one individual showing inbreeding signs. We developed a science-driven breeding program based on population genetic structure, identity by descent (IBD) analysis, and Identity by State (IBS) analysis. This program prioritizes pairings with low kinship while maintaining a balanced ancestral lineage. Discussion: This study underscores the importance of genomic tools in managing captive populations, offering actionable insights to mitigate inbreeding risks and improve long-term viability. This approach offers a model for optimizing breeding strategies in other endangered species conservation efforts.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Whole genome sequencing informs SNP-based breeding strategies to safeguard genetic diversity in captive African lions
- Date Crossref
- 16/04/2025
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.